"You
can't have a hundred percent security and also then have a hundred
percent privacy, zero inconvenience....."~Barack Hussein Obama
Mr. President, I prefer 100% freedom, 100% privacy (unless I use my
freedom to choose otherwise). "Those who would give up essential liberty
to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety."~Benjamin Franklin
My
government doesn't have the RIGHT to decide if any inconvenience by 4th
amendment violations is worth any false sense of safety that might be
gained.
Mr. President and all you idiots
in Congress: You cannot legislate evil out of the world. Violating the
God-given, Constitutionally protected rights of law abiding citizens
didn't stop the Boston Bomber- even when his native country tipped you
idiots off. The government doesn't have the right to violate my privacy
without probable cause and a warrant. I suggest you read the 4th
amendment of the US Constitution. It doesn't say it is a suggestion. It
doesn't say you can conduct warrantless searches if you think it is
what's best for me or my fellow countrymen.
The 4th Amendment says: The right
of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No comments:
Post a Comment